top of page

The key points of 'Freakonomics: Revised Edition' by Steven D. Levitt

The 'Freakonomics: Revised Edition' by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner explores various intriguing aspects of human behavior and economic incentives. Through a series of thought-provoking examples and case studies, the authors delve into the complexities of economic incentives, information asymmetry, correlation vs. causation, and the role of incentives in education. This article aims to highlight the key takeaways from each of these essential topics.

Key Takeaways

  • Understanding the power of economic incentives in influencing human behavior

  • Recognizing the unintended consequences of certain incentives

  • Distinguishing between correlation and causation to avoid misleading conclusions

  • Appreciating the impact of information asymmetry on decision-making in markets

  • Evaluating the role of incentives in education and its effects on student and teacher performance

The Authors and Their Backgrounds

Steven D. Levitt

Steven D. Levitt is a renowned economist known for his work in applying economic theory to diverse subjects not typically covered by traditional economists. He has received numerous awards, including the John Bates Clark Medal, which is awarded to the most influential economist under the age of 40.

Levitt's approach to economics is not just about numbers and charts; it's about exploring the hidden side of everything. He challenges conventional wisdom and asks provocative questions, such as why drug dealers still live with their moms or how schoolteachers might cheat to improve their students' test scores.

  • John Bates Clark Medal: Awarded in 2003

  • Co-author of Freakonomics

  • Professor at the University of Chicago

Levitt's work exemplifies the power of thinking differently and the importance of questioning the status quo. His insights have not only influenced economics but also have sparked conversations across various fields.

Stephen J. Dubner

Stephen J. Dubner is an American journalist and author who co-authored 'Freakonomics' with Steven D. Levitt. His work focuses on uncovering the hidden side of everything, revealing surprising connections and insights. Dubner's writing style is engaging and accessible, making complex economic concepts approachable for a wide audience. He is also the host of the 'Freakonomics Radio' podcast, where he explores the hidden side of everyday life through interviews and storytelling.

Economic Incentives and Human Behavior

Incentives in Different Contexts

In the diverse tapestry of human society, incentives play a pivotal role in shaping behavior across various contexts. From the corporate world to personal relationships, the types of incentives—monetary, social, and moral—can significantly influence decisions and actions.

Monetary incentives are straightforward: they involve financial rewards or penalties. Social incentives hinge on the approval or disapproval of others, often driving individuals to conform to societal norms. Moral incentives, on the other hand, are internal compasses that guide behavior based on a sense of right and wrong.

Here's a brief overview of how incentives function in different spheres:

  • Corporate: Bonuses and promotions encourage employee performance.

  • Education: Scholarships and grades motivate student achievement.

  • Public Policy: Tax breaks and fines influence citizen compliance.

Each context presents unique challenges and opportunities for leveraging incentives to achieve desired outcomes. It's crucial to recognize that incentives are not one-size-fits-all and must be carefully tailored to the specific environment and objectives.

Unintended Consequences

In the context of economic incentives, the concept of unintended consequences is a crucial consideration. It underscores the idea that actions taken to achieve a certain outcome may lead to unforeseen and often undesirable results. This phenomenon is particularly evident in policy-making, where well-intentioned decisions can have unintended and adverse effects on various stakeholders. For instance, a government subsidy aimed at increasing the affordability of a particular good may inadvertently lead to overconsumption and market distortions, ultimately resulting in negative social and economic repercussions. It is essential for policymakers to carefully evaluate the potential unintended consequences of their actions to mitigate adverse outcomes and ensure the effectiveness of their policies.

Correlation vs. Causation

Examples of Misleading Correlations

In the realm of statistics, it's crucial to distinguish between correlation and causation. A classic example of a misleading correlation is the relationship between ice cream sales and drowning rates. As ice cream sales increase, so do drowning rates, leading some to mistakenly believe that ice cream consumption causes drowning. However, the underlying factor here is the seasonality; both ice cream sales and drowning rates naturally increase during the summer months.

Another instance is the correlation between the number of storks and the birth rate in certain European countries. This whimsical example has been used to illustrate that correlation does not imply causation; the presence of storks is not responsible for the number of births.

Understanding these distinctions is essential for making informed decisions and avoiding the pitfalls of misleading statistics.

Identifying Causal Relationships

In the quest to identify causal relationships, it is crucial to distinguish between correlation and causation. This distinction is fundamental in drawing accurate conclusions from data analysis. One approach to identifying causation is through controlled experiments, where variables are manipulated to observe the effect on the outcome. Another method involves using statistical techniques to establish causal relationships based on observational data. However, it is important to exercise caution and consider potential confounding variables that may influence the observed relationship. Here is a simple example of a controlled experiment to illustrate the concept of identifying causal relationships:

This table demonstrates the impact of different treatments on the outcome, providing a clear comparison of the causal effect. When identifying causal relationships, it is essential to critically evaluate the evidence and consider alternative explanations for the observed associations. This ensures a thorough understanding of the underlying mechanisms and avoids drawing misleading conclusions.

The Impact of Information Asymmetry

Information Asymmetry in Markets

Information asymmetry in markets is a critical concept in economics. It refers to situations where one party in a transaction has more or better information than the other, leading to a power imbalance. This can result in inefficiencies and market distortions. To illustrate, consider the following example of information asymmetry in the used car market:

In this case, the seller has more information about the car's condition, creating a potential for adverse selection and moral hazard. Buyers may overpay for a lower-quality car due to the information asymmetry.

Furthermore, information asymmetry can lead to a lack of trust between parties, hindering trade and exchange. It underscores the importance of transparency and disclosure in markets to mitigate the negative effects of information asymmetry.

Implications for Decision Making

When it comes to decision making, information asymmetry plays a crucial role. It is essential to recognize the impact of differing levels of information among parties involved in a transaction. This can lead to unequal power dynamics and influence the outcomes of decisions. To illustrate, consider the following table:

In this scenario, the party with lower information experiences a negative outcome, highlighting the significance of information asymmetry in decision making. Additionally, it is important to note that transparency and accountability are key factors in addressing information asymmetry, ensuring fair and informed decision making.

Lastly, it is crucial to consider the ethical implications of decision making in the presence of information asymmetry. This can involve ethical dilemmas and the need for ethical frameworks to guide decision making in such contexts.

The Role of Incentives in Education

Incentives for Teachers and Students

In the realm of education, incentives play a crucial role in shaping the behavior and performance of both teachers and students. For teachers, incentives often come in the form of bonuses or career advancements tied to student performance metrics. This system aims to motivate educators to improve their teaching methods and engage more effectively with their students.

Students, on the other hand, may be offered incentives such as scholarships, awards, or recognition for academic excellence. These rewards can foster a competitive environment and encourage students to excel in their studies. However, it's important to ensure that these incentives align with long-term educational goals and do not solely focus on short-term achievements.

Consider the following points when evaluating incentives in education:

  • The clarity of the goals set for teachers and students.

  • The fairness and accessibility of the incentives offered.

  • The potential for incentives to create undue pressure or unethical behavior.

Measuring Educational Outcomes

Measuring educational outcomes is crucial for assessing the effectiveness of educational programs and interventions. It allows educators and policymakers to evaluate the impact of various initiatives and make informed decisions about resource allocation and program improvement.

When measuring educational outcomes, it's important to consider both quantitative and qualitative data. This may include standardized test scores, graduation rates, student attendance, and qualitative feedback from teachers and students.

It's also essential to establish clear metrics and benchmarks for measuring educational outcomes. This provides a framework for assessing progress and identifying areas that require attention and improvement.


In conclusion, 'Freakonomics: Revised Edition' by Steven D. Levitt provides valuable insights into the world of economics and human behavior. The book's exploration of incentives and their impact on decision-making is particularly enlightening. Readers are encouraged to delve deeper into the book to uncover the key points and apply them to their own understanding of the world around them.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main concept of 'Freakonomics: Revised Edition'?

The main concept of 'Freakonomics: Revised Edition' is to explore the hidden side of everything by applying economic theory to diverse subjects such as crime, education, and parenting.

Who are the authors of 'Freakonomics: Revised Edition'?

The authors of 'Freakonomics: Revised Edition' are Steven D. Levitt, an economist, and Stephen J. Dubner, a journalist.

What are some examples of misleading correlations discussed in the book?

Some examples of misleading correlations discussed in the book include the correlation between crime rates and abortion, and the correlation between parenting styles and children's success.

How does the book address the role of incentives in education?

The book addresses the role of incentives in education by examining the impact of incentives for teachers and students, as well as the measurement of educational outcomes.

What is information asymmetry in markets and how does it affect decision making?

Information asymmetry in markets refers to situations where one party has more or better information than the other party. It affects decision making by influencing the behavior of buyers and sellers based on the information available to each party.

What are some unintended consequences discussed in 'Freakonomics: Revised Edition'?

Some unintended consequences discussed in 'Freakonomics: Revised Edition' include the unintended outcomes of policies and actions that result from economic incentives and human behavior.

Related Posts

See All


bottom of page